On the morning of July 30th, I weighed 283.6 lbs.
It hurt to walk around the block.
I was really in bad shape, and heading to worse shape.
24 days later, of drastically reduced calorie consumption with some modest exercise...
...I can hike (walk) again.
24 days
I took a 7 mile hike Tuesday afternoon
On Wednesday I took a 5.6 mile hike.
Don't know what my weight is, although I am looking forward to finding out on Saturday
I already feel like a new person....
I am guessing I have dropped something in the neighborhood of 20lbs
I can look at myself in the mirror again.
I can take a picture of myself without cringing.
I am not quite back yet.
But I am on my way.
.
.
.
The Marc Jacobs Weight Loss Journal exposes the secrets of diet and weight loss. I do not want to keep you in a state of suspense. Here is the secret: Eat Less. Exercise is critical to one's health. Exercise is not the critical component of weight loss. This blog will focus on a healthy lifestyle with an emphasis on eating properly. Marvelous mental musings posted daily. I make an effort to be interesting, instructive and inspiring.
Showing posts with label Jack Bauer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jack Bauer. Show all posts
Thursday, August 23, 2018
24
Labels:
1000 calories,
24,
fitbit,
FITBITTER,
hiking,
Illinois,
Jack Bauer,
Live Another Day,
marc jacobs,
monmouth,
quick weight loss,
secrets to quick weight loss,
versa,
WEIGHT LOSS TIPS
Friday, February 13, 2015
YANKEES I KNOW. WHAT ARE METS?
The Yankees, I know. I have been a fan since I was 10 years old, maybe even earlier. Mickey Mantle was still on the team when I started paying attention. And he wasn't the DH, as that ridiculous idea hadn't been invented yet.
The Mets, I know (and have always 'hated')
But until recently, I had not noticed the word, 'mets' on exercise equipment. The explanation is very technical and I have simply reproduced an entry from wikipedia.com to offer a definition.
But until recently, I had not noticed the word, 'mets' on exercise equipment. The explanation is very technical and I have simply reproduced an entry from wikipedia.com to offer a definition.
- Scope of usage of the MET concept
- MET (Metabolic Equivalent): The ratio of the work metabolic rate to the resting metabolic rate. One MET is defined as 1 kcal/kg/hour and is roughly equivalent to the energy cost of sitting quietly. A MET also is defined as oxygen uptake in ml/kg/min with one MET equal to the oxygen cost of sitting quietly, equivalent to 3.5 ml/kg/min.
- Moreover MET is used to provide general medical thresholds and guidelines to a population.A MET is the ratio of the rate of energy expended during an activity to the rate of energy expended at rest. For example, 1 MET is the rate of energy expenditure while at rest. A 4 MET activity expends 4 times the energy used by the body at rest. If a person does a 4 MET activity for 30 minutes, he or she has done 4 x 30 = 120 MET-minutes (or 2.0 MET-hours) of physical activity. A person could also achieve 120 MET-minutes by doing an 8 MET activity for 15 minutes.
Physical activity MET Light intensity activities < 3 sleeping 0.9 watching television 1.0 writing, desk work, typing 1.8 walking, 1.7 mph (2.7 km/h), level ground, strolling, very slow 2.3 walking, 2.5 mph (4 km/h) 2.9 Moderate intensity activities 3 to 6 bicycling, stationary, 50 watts, very light effort 3.0 walking 3.0 mph (4.8 km/h) 3.3 calisthenics, home exercise, light or moderate effort, general 3.5 walking 3.4 mph (5.5 km/h) 3.6 bicycling, <10 mph (16 km/h), leisure, to work or for pleasure 4.0 bicycling, stationary, 100 watts, light effort 5.5 sexual activity 5.8 Vigorous intensity activities > 6 jogging, general 7.0 calisthenics (e.g. pushups, situps, pullups,jumping jacks), heavy, vigorous effort 8.0 running jogging, in place 8.0 rope jumping 10.0
As I understand this information, watching TV has the equivalent MET (Metabolic Equivalent) of 1.0. Bicycling on a stationary bike with very light effort has a MET of 3.0. The body needs three times the energy for biking as TV watching. However, it could also be said that WATCHING TV FOR 3 HOURS would equal the energy needed to bike (lightly) for one hour. JOGGING REQUIRES 8 TIMES the energy than TV watching. However, if one could watch TV for 8 hours, one would use the same energy as a one hour jog.
CONCLUSION: Although many of us use exercise to assist in weight loss, as we know that vigorous exercise will burn calories - SIMPLY LIVING BURNS CALORIES TOO. This should not be a surprise as for many people that hardly exercise at all - we still burn nearly 2000 calories per day.
RIDICULOUS CONCLUSION: You could watch one season of '24' and really burn some calories. Each episode without commercials runs about 42 minutes. There are 24 episodes x 42 minutes/episode which is 1008 minutes. This translates to about 17 hours. So, if you sat on your couch and watched one complete season of '24' you would 'burn' even more calories than you would doing TWO HOURS OF VIGOROUS CALISTHENICS. A 17 hour TV watching marathon would be a very dubious achievement. It doesn't really seem very practical. Especially as a weight loss idea, as most of those 17 hours of TV watching would likely be augmented by 17 hours of TV SNACKING! It's probably just best to burn some extra calories doing an actual physical activity.
Labels:
24,
blog,
couch,
DH,
diet,
elliptical,
exercise,
Jack Bauer,
Kiefer Sutherland,
loss,
marc jacobs,
met,
metabolic equivalent,
Mickey Mantle,
New York Mets,
New York Yankees,
Rabbi Hillel Diet,
Spring Training,
weight
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)








