Showing posts with label studies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label studies. Show all posts

Friday, January 22, 2016

DIET SODA BETTER THAN WATER FOR WEIGHT LOSS?

You might have heard about this in the media during the past couple of days. A recent study published in the November 2015 International Journal of Obesity made the claim that diet soda was better than water for weight loss.  The conclusion of this study reminds me of something that Dennis Prager, author, speaker and radio personality has said many times - Studies either 'prove' what is obvious or they are wrong.  The conclusion that diet soda is more helpful for dieting and weight control is absolutely laughable. It makes one wonder.... Who would fund such a study?  Turns out the answer to that question is Coca Cola and Pepsico.  When this study appeared in the International Journal of Obesity that 'minor' detail was left out... Care to know the reason why that information was omitted?  Space issues.  How much 'space' is needed to identify the sponsor of a study? It is not usually a great idea to have any organization fund a scientific study who has a vested interest in the outcome. For example, since the government (in fact practically every government on Earth) is vested in proving global warming - funding for studies proving global warming are easily obtainable. Now if you are a skeptic on global warming... getting funding just might be a problem.  Today's lesson: Be careful when accepting the conclusions of any 'study' - especially if you don't know who funded the study.


Your Food Diary For:

Thursday, January 21, 2016

BREAKFAST Calories Carbs Fat Protein Sodium Sugar
Quaker - Instant Oatmeal - Original, 6 packet 600 114 12 24 450 0
KELLOGGS - RAISIN BRAN (dry cereal) 380 92 2 10 420 36

980 206 14 34 870 36
L U N C H
Whole Foods - Macaroni and Cheese, 0.75 cup 240 23 11 11 345 4
Generic - Grilled Brussel Sprouts, 1 cup 65 13 3 6 23 0
Gardien - Chicken Scallopini, 2 cutlet 220 8 9 28 680 0
WHOLE FOODS 7608 - YOGURT PRETZELS, (approx 8 pcs) 190 28 8 2 180 19
WHOLE FOODS 8497 - CHERRY VANILLA GRANOLA 319 53 9 7 80 20

1,034 125 40 53 1,308 43
D I N N E R
Jason's Deli - SPICY SEAFOOD GUMBO, 1 Bowl 230 26 8 12 1,710 3
Jason's Deli - Turkey Wrap, 1 Wrap 390 42 17 23 1,080 5
WHOLE FOODS 5536 - YOGURT ALMONDS, (approx 12 pcs) 440 44 28 8 40 38
WHOLE FOODS 5938 - UNSWEETENED BANANA CHIPS 161 15 9 2 5 1
WHOLE FOODS. 8497 - CHERRY VANILLA GRANOLA 240 40 7 5 60 15

1,461 167 69 50 2,895 62


Totals 3,475 499 124 137 5,073 141
Your Daily Goal 3,401 425 113 171 2,300 127
Remaining -74 -73 -10 34 -2,772 -13
Calories Carbs Fat Protein Sodium Sugar
*You've earned 1,471 extra calories from exercise today         



.

       Your Exercise Diary for:

Thursday, January 21, 2016

Cardiovascular Minutes Calories Burned
PRECOR EFX576i ELLIPTICAL 125 1,629
MFP iOS calorie adjustment Ic_i N/A -158

   
Daily Total / Goal 126 / 30 1,471 / 590  
Weekly Total / Goal 608 / 210 7,808 / 4,130


.
total calories consumed 3475 calories
total calories burned (125 min elliptical) 1629 calories
total net 1846 calories
.....................

fitbit day 140
20160 steps
. . . . . . . .

.



Wednesday, January 6, 2016

THE 3500 CALORIE MYTH

This was part of an interesting article that I found on WebMD.com.  I actually had thought that the 3500 calorie rule was 'settled science'  (you know, like global warming....)


OK, I am absolutely not being serious here.... THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS SETTLED SCIENCE.  Unless, your scientific beliefs are based on some kind of quasi religion, science is never settled. (If you think science can be settled, go back to your 9th grade general science textbook and look up how many planets there were back in the old days - a book published today will give a different answer.  SPOILER ALERT: Although the new settled science will list one planet less, no planets were destroyed by the Borg or Darth Vader's Death Star.) As new discoveries, are made, so-called settled science can become quite unsettled.  If anyone argues a scientific point and uses as their argument that the science is settled - you can be sure that you are talking to Al Gore or a left-wing college professor or someone equally ignorant. The most agreed upon scientific theories are born from research not self-important guru politicians or polls. The next time someone tries to prove a point advising you that 97% of scientists agree on anything - just know that you are talking to someone who does not know the first thing about science. Science is determined by hypothesis, and experimentation - not the editorial page of the New York Times. That is way more pontificating than necessary for today... Today, I am going to discuss something that I admit I did think was settled science - and like much of settled science - research has unsettled it.

NEWS FLASH....FROM WebMD (I have reproduced just the beginning of the article from their website)
.
Do You Have to Cut 3,500 Calories to Lose a Pound?
The idea that dieters need to cut this many calories -- with diet, exercise or both -- to lose 1 pound of weight comes from an influential scientific paper published in 1958. Max Wishnofsky, MD, a doctor who lived in Brooklyn, N.Y., tried to sum up everything we knew about how calories are stored by the body. He concluded that when the body is in a steady caloric state -- meaning it isn’t fasting or starving -- extra calories will be stored as fat, and it would take 3,500 extra calories to create a pound of fat. In that same steady state, he also said it would take a deficit of 3,500 calories to lose a pound of weight. For decades, the “Wishnofsky Rule” has been math that determined dieters live by.

The trouble is that it’s wrong.

The 3,500-calorie rule doesn’t work because the body adjusts to weight loss. It quickly decreases the number of calories it needs to maintain its new, lighter size, says Corby Martin, PhD, director of the Ingestive Behavior Laboratory at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center in Baton Rouge, LA. That means weight loss slows down over time. People who expect to drop a pound for every 3,500 calories they cut will soon become frustrated when the scale doesn’t cooperate.

Let’s say a dieter knows they need to eat 2,500 calories a day to maintain their current weight. But they want to slim down. So they decide to shave 500 calories off their daily intake. According to the Wishnofsky Rule, after about a week of doing that, they should lose a pound.

“For the first week or two, the 3,500 calorie-per-pound rule kind of works, roughly, but after the first couple of weeks it doesn’t work,” Martin says.

Here’s why: In 3 or 4 weeks, you need less food to maintain that new, svelter shape.

The good news is that researchers have been working hard to update Wishnofsky’s formula. There are new calculators, like the Body Weight Planner available from the NIH and the Weight Loss Predictor from Pennington. Give them a few key details, like your sex, age, weight, height, activity level, and the date you want to hit your goal, and they’ll give you a more realistic daily calorie goal to get you there.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
In the next couple of days we are going to explore the BODY WEIGHT PLANNER from NIH as well as the WEIGHT LOSS PREDICTOR from Pennington.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The studies that prove that 3500 calories do not always result in a net gain or loss remind me of a comment that I have heard Dennis Prager, radio host, columnist and book author, say many times on the radio.  "Ever since I attended college, I have been convinced that either “studies” confirm what common sense suggests or that they are mistaken."  Most of us already knew that the 3500 calorie rule could not have been exactly right.  Common sense should have told us, as so many of us already knew from our own experiences, that the 3500 calorie rule was simply was not completely true.
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Your Food Diary For:

Tuesday, January 5, 2016

BREAKFAST Calories Carbs Fat Protein Sodium Sugar
Safeway Eating Right - Granola Cereal, 1.0 cup 330 66 4 8 300 21
Malt O Meal - Honey Nut Scooters, 150 g 600 120 8 15 1,050 45

930 186 11 23 1,350 66
L U N C H
American Cheese - Kraft Single Milk..mine, 2 slice (21g) 140 4 9 8 440 2
Eggs - Grade A Large, 3 egg (50g) 210 0 15 18 210 0
Kroger - Deli Sliced Ham, 3 slices 45 2 2 8 488 2
S. Rosen's - 100% Whole Wheat Bread, 1 slice 100 19 1 5 190 3

495 25 27 39 1,328 7
D I N N E R
Doctor Kracker - Pumpkin Seed Cheddar Crisp Bread, 8 Piece 800 104 36 32 1,200 0
Campbells Home Style Soup - Italian Wedding Soup, 2.5 cup 250 33 6 15 1,025 10

1,050 137 42 47 2,225 10
S N A C K S
ROBERTO - GRISSINI TORINESI (BREADSTICKS), 16 BREADSTICKS 140 22 3 4 280 0
the Fresh Market - Cranberry Oat Sweet & Savory Crisps, 40 -10 crisp 400 80 8 10 575 30

540 102 11 14 855 30
Totals 3,015 450 91 122 5,758 113
Your Daily Goal 2,564 320 85 129 2,300 96
Remaining -451 -129 -5 7 -3,457 -17
Calories Carbs Fat Protein Sodium Sugar
*You've earned 634 extra calories from exercise today         

.

Your Exercise Diary for:

Tuesday, January 5, 2016
Cardiovascular Minutes Calories Burned
MATRIX TREADMILL 75 730
MFP iOS calorie adjustment Ic_i N/A -96

   
Daily Total / Goal 76 / 30 634 / 590  
Weekly Total / Goal 261 / 210 4,739 / 4,130


.
total calories consumed 3015 calories
total calories (75 minutes treadmill) 730 calories
total net calories 2285 calories
.....................

fitbit day 124
14747 steps
. . . . . . . . . . .


.



.